Information for patients: distribute reliable
information through medicines agencies rather than pretend to control
industry advertising
Ambiguous proposals
made by the Commission, aiming to favour disguised direct-to-consumer
advertising of prescription drugs in Europe, were rejected en bloc
by the European Parliament. Parliamentarians realised the dangers
of permitting such advertising, which would be as uncontrollable
as current advertising to health care professionals. They voted
a number of amendments aiming to favour public access to reliable
information held by medicines agencies.
Totally ignoring
parliamentary opinion, which has been publicly endorsed by several
ministers, the Commission has simply reinstated its initial proposals.
It opposes amendments intended to prevent the drift towards direct-to-consumer
advertising of prescription drugs and amendments designed to develop
patient information independently of pharmaceutical companies.
The Commission
thus opposes the recommendation that drug packaging and patient
leaflets provide better, clearer information. For example, the adjunction
of information in braille on drug boxes is considered "disproportionate"
by the Commission; organisations for the visually disabled will
certainly be pleased. Likewise, inclusion of the international non
proprietary name on "recall" advertisements aimed at health
professionals and the public is not considered crucial by the Commission.
Those who recall the "secret remedies" of the early 20th
century will find this somewhat puzzling.
The Forum demands that amendments 74 and 78 article 1 points 37
and 38a, and amendments 106, 107 and 191 article 1 points 55b
and 57 be upheld.
©La revue Prescrire, for
the Medicines in Europe Forum 7 April 2003
|